โ† Back to Newsletter

Trump’s Global Tariffs Curtailed Trade, Data Shows - The New York Times

November 19, 2025 ยท Google News — International Trade ยท View source โ†—

New research from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) indicates that the global tariffs implemented by the Trump administration, which began in 2018, ultimately curtailed international trade rather than achieving their stated goals. The study found that these tariffs led to higher prices for American consumers and businesses, and did not significantly boost domestic production or employment in the targeted industries. This analysis offers critical insights for importers and trade compliance professionals navigating the complexities of trade policy and its real-world economic impacts.

The findings highlight that the burden of these tariffs largely fell on American entities. Specifically, for tariffs imposed on Chinese goods, economists observed a near one-for-one increase in import prices, meaning U.S. importers and consumers bore almost the entire cost. While some American companies did shift parts of their supply chains away from China to other countries not subject to the tariffs, this reallocation was not sufficient to fully offset the overall reduction in trade. This underscores the significant financial implications for businesses relying on imported goods and the challenges in adapting supply chains to new tariff regimes.

The tariffs examined in the study included those imposed globally on steel and aluminum under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as well as a vast array of Chinese goods under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. These measures, initiated in 2018, aimed to protect domestic industries. However, the NBER research suggests that the primary outcome was an increase in costs for U.S. businesses and consumers, rather than a substantial resurgence in domestic manufacturing or job creation in the targeted sectors. It's important to note that while the study confirms the imposition of these tariffs and their economic effects, specific tariff percentages are not detailed in the summary of the research.

For importers and trade compliance officers, these findings reinforce the critical importance of a comprehensive understanding of tariff regimes and their broader economic consequences. The research underscores the need for agile supply chain management and proactive strategies to mitigate risks associated with fluctuating trade policies. Businesses should continuously evaluate their sourcing strategies, monitor global trade developments, and ensure robust compliance programs are in place to adapt to potential changes in tariff structures and their impact on import costs and market competitiveness.