โ† Back to Newsletter

US Court of International Trade orders tariff refunds worth ~$130 bn - Fibre2Fashion

March 05, 2026 ยท Google News — International Trade ยท View source โ†—

The United States (US) Court of International Trade (CIT) has issued a significant order directing the US government to refund approximately $130 billion in tariffs. These tariffs were collected under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on various goods imported from China. This landmark decision is the result of a lawsuit initiated by more than 3,600 US companies, challenging the legality of certain tariff expansions implemented by the previous administration.

The ruling primarily affects the over 3,600 US companies that were plaintiffs in the lawsuit and paid these specific tariffs. The lawsuit contended that the tariffs, particularly those designated as "List 3" and "List 4A," were unlawfully imposed or expanded beyond the scope of the initial investigation into China's trade practices. The CIT found that the United States Trade Representative (USTR) failed to provide an adequate explanation for its decision to broaden the scope of these tariffs, concluding that the USTR did not properly consider all relevant factors or offer a reasoned justification for its actions.

The tariffs in question include:

  • List 3 Tariffs: These were applied to approximately $200 billion worth of Chinese imports. They were initially imposed at a rate of 10% starting on September 24, 2018, and subsequently increased to 25% on May 10, 2019.
  • List 4A Tariffs: These targeted approximately $120 billion worth of Chinese imports. They began at a rate of 15% on September 1, 2019. As part of the "Phase One" trade deal, these tariffs were later reduced to 7.5% on February 14, 2020.
The court's decision now paves the way for the companies involved in the lawsuit to receive refunds for these collected duties.

For importers, especially those who were part of the lawsuit, it is crucial to closely monitor further developments and prepare all necessary documentation related to the tariffs paid. While this ruling is a significant victory for the plaintiffs, the US government could still appeal the decision. Therefore, companies that paid these tariffs, whether directly involved in the lawsuit or not, should consider consulting with legal counsel to understand the implications for their specific situations and to prepare for potential next steps, including the process for claiming refunds or assessing their eligibility if they were not part of the original litigation.